This practice area addresses the following Markle Connecting for Health Core Principles for a Networked Environment:
Use Limitation
Individual Participation and Control
Data Quality and Integrity
Accountability and Oversight
See Architecture for Privacy in a Networked Health Information Environment for more information.
Audit trails are a basic requirement for electronic health information in EHRs and PHRs. Consumer Access Services must provide consumers with convenient electronic access to an audit trail as a mechanism to demonstrate compliance with use and disclosure authorization(s). An audit trail as defined here is an easy-to-comprehend date-, time-, and source-stamped historical record of significant activities and transactions that pertain to access of the consumer's account and the use and disclosure of personal data within. Of note, electronic audit trails have been in wide use in Internet banking; a 2004 survey found that almost all banks provide joint account holders with a clear audit trail that details which account holder performed which transaction.1
The audit trail compiled and maintained by a Consumer Access Service should be the same audit trail displayed to the consumer, and each audit trail entry should be immutable (i.e., unchanging and unchangeable) in content.
Persistence of the audit trail should be commensurate with the data persistence policies of the Consumer Access Service. For example, if the Consumer Access Service retains professionally sourced data for seven years, then entries in the consumer's audit trail should persist for at least this same period of time.
Source-stamping is particularly important for end-users to evaluate the validity of information displayed from a consumer data stream. There are cases when a given data element may have more than one "source." For example, consider the case in which a Consumer Access Service is authorized to obtain the previous 90 days of prescription medication history on the consumer's behalf from a retail pharmacy clearinghouse. When the information is imported into the consumer's application, the clearinghouse is a "source" of the transaction. Upstream of that transaction, there were other "sources," like the doctor who wrote the prescription and the pharmacy that filled it. Ideally, the audit history should include each relevant upstream and downstream source. Consumer-sourced entries must be marked as such.
Each Consumer Access Service should maintain an easy-to-comprehend and clearly labeled electronic audit trail containing immutable entries that pertain to the consumer's account, information, and policy consent. Each entry should identify, at a minimum, who has accessed the consumer's records, a date, time, and source stamp for each such access, and the source of each significant transaction. The audit trail should be retained at minimum according to the data retention practice of the service.
We suggest the following as "auditable" events/activities:
Revocation (e.g., the consumer decides to terminate a previously authorized consent that allowed sharing of data with a 3rd-party service provider)
(For related information, see CP8: Consumer Obtainment and Control of Information, Proxy Access.)
__________
©2008-2011, Markle Foundation
This work was originally published as part of a compendium called The Markle Connecting for Health Common Framework for Networked Personal Health Information. It is made available free of charge, but subject to the terms of a License. You may make copies of this work; however, by copying or exercising any other rights to the work, you accept and agree to be bound by the terms of the License. All copies of this work must reproduce this copyright information and notice.