Many policy and industry leaders now agree that empowerment of consumers—enhanced by convenient access to networked health information services—will help drive necessary changes to the health care sector. The Markle Connecting for Health Common Framework for Networked Personal Health Information provides a foundation for maintaining trust among all participants—business, professional, and consumer—in electronic health information networks.
The objective is to give consumers the ability to compile electronic copies of their personal health information, including their own contributions, under a set of fair practices that respect personal preferences for how information may be collected and shared. The term "networked" implies connectivity across entities. Networking health information is critical given the fragmentation of most health-related services in the United States.
Markle Connecting for Health, a public-private collaborative group engaging more than 100 organizations representing all major components of the health sector, convened the Work Group on Consumer Access Policies1 to identify a set of practices to support the emergence of networked personal health records (PHRs) in the public interest. PHRs include a wide variety of electronic applications designed to help consumers manage their health-related information and transactions, communicate better with clinicians, or take better care of themselves and loved ones.
The Common Framework resources are intended to foster network relationships and, ultimately, to enhance trust among the following parties:
We distinguish Consumer Access Services from PHR applications (although both could be supplied in one integrated product). Consumers ideally will have a choice of services to enable PHR applications of their choosing to exchange data with multiple Health Data Sources across a secure "network of networks."2 The diagram below illustrates this basic distinction:

The rationale for Consumer Access Services rests primarily on two points:
The Common Framework resources are designed to guide organizations participating in what we call "consumer data streams" – the flow of personal health information into and out of consumer-accessible applications such as PHRs. (See CT1: Technology Overview for a discussion of "consumer data streams" and how they contrast with "business data streams").
There are many emerging consumer data streams today. Hundreds of PHR applications now offer a variety of services to U.S. consumers, including products sponsored by providers, health plans, employers, technology companies, non-profits, and others. Several global brands have launched initiatives to act as Consumer Access Services. There also is a growing number of patient community sites, often described as "Health 2.0," that take innovative approaches to health problems from outside traditional health care.
Public opinion surveys commissioned by the Markle Foundation3 and others have found that most Americans want to have electronic copies of their health records. The research indicates that Americans understand that quality of care could improve when their health information is available over the Internet to them and those who care for them. Markle also found that eight in 10 Americans are very concerned about identity theft or fraud, and the possibility of their data being used by marketers without their permission.
This Common Framework provides a voluntary approach to meet the dual challenges of making personal health information more readily available to consumers, while also protecting it from unfair or harmful practices.
Markle Connecting for Health has published a set of principles that provide the foundation for managing personal health information within consumer-accessible data streams. The consensus principles, based on accepted international fair information practices, are presented fully in The Architecture for Privacy in a Networked Health Information Environment.4 Taken together, the nine principles form a comprehensive approach to privacy, the hallmark for which is that personal information be handled according to the individual's understanding and consent. In brief, the principles, and the corresponding papers in this Framework, are as follows:
| Connecting for Health Core Principles | Practice Areas of this Common Framework for Networked Personal Health Information |
|---|---|
| 1. Openness and transparency: Consumers should be able to know what information has been collected about them, the purpose of its use, who can access and use it, and where it resides. They should also be informed about how they may obtain access to information collected about them and how they may control who has access to it. | |
| 2. Purpose specification: The purposes for which personal data are collected should be specified at the time of collection, and the subsequent use should be limited to those purposes, or others that are specified on each occasion of change of purpose. | |
| 3. Collection limitation and data minimization: Personal health information should only be collected for specified purposes and should be obtained by lawful and fair means. The collection and storage of personal health data should be limited to that information necessary to carry out the specified purpose. Where possible, consumers should have the knowledge of or provide consent for collection of their personal health information. | |
| 4. Use limitation: Personal data should not be disclosed, made available, or otherwise used for purposes other than those specified. | |
| 5. Individual participation and control: Consumers should be able to control access to their personal information. They should know who is storing what information on them, and how that information is being used. They should also be able to review the way their information is being used or stored. | |
| 6. Data quality and integrity: All personal data collected should be relevant to the purposes for which they are to be used and should be accurate, complete, and up-to-date. | |
| 7. Security safeguards and controls: Reasonable safeguards should protect personal data against such risks as loss or unauthorized access, use, destruction, modification, or disclosure. | |
| 8. Accountability and oversight: Entities in control of personal health information must be held accountable for implementing these principles. | |
| 9. Remedies: Remedies must exist to address security breaches or privacy violations. |
The general standard is that practices must not be misleading or unfair. Misleading practices include misrepresentations or omissions that may contribute to a reasonable consumer's decision to use a service, provide personal data, or grant permissions relating to that data.5 Unfairness may occur when consumers are injured after being forced or coerced into making decisions in the marketplace that are not their own.6 Emerging consumer data streams must be based on trusted and transparent relationships, without behind-the-curtain uses or disclosures of personal information that would catch an average consumer unawares. It would be alarming for consumers, as well as all legitimate network participants, if consumer data streams were harnessed by "shadow" businesses that exploit indirect and involuntary relationships with consumers.
We contend that a foundational set of practices, rooted in the above principles, would help sustain public confidence in consumer data streams. We sought to propose a set of practices that, when taken together, encourage appropriate handling of personal health information. The Consumer Framework for Networked Personal Health Information introduces nine policy and seven technical resources that provide a foundation for organizations doing any of the following:
At this early point in the evolution of PHRs and services to support them, we propose this as a voluntary framework. We recommend that all organizations develop clear and public policies for each of the practice areas in this framework. All practice areas must be addressed to provide adequate protections to consumers and to encourage trust across a network.
The framework consists of Consumer Policy (CP) and Consumer Technology (CT) papers, although there is often not a firm distinction between policy and technology. Indeed, it is a hallmark of the Common Framework approach that decisions on policy and technology are interdependent.
This framework is the product of the Connecting for Health Work Group on Consumer Access Policies for Networked Personal Health Information. (See Work Group roster in Acknowledgements.) Connecting for Health thanks Work Group Chair David Lansky, PhD, Pacific Business Group on Health, for leading the consensus development process for this framework, and Josh Lemieux, Markle Foundation, for drafting and guiding the documents. We particularly thank Carol Diamond, MD, MPH, Managing Director of the Health Program at the Markle Foundation, for developing the conceptual structure for this approach to networked personal health information.
Jim Dempsey, JD, Center for Democracy and Technology; Janlori Goldman, JD, Health Privacy Project and Columbia University School of Public Health; Joy Pritts, JD, Center on Medical Record Rights and Privacy, Health Policy Institute, Georgetown University; and Marcy Wilder, JD, Hogan & Hartson LLP, made important contributions to the policy framework. Matt Kavanagh, independent contractor, and Clay Shirky, New York University Graduate Interactive Telecommunications Program, made important contributions to the technology framework.
__________
©2008-2011, Markle Foundation
This work was originally published as part of a compendium called The Markle Connecting for Health Common Framework for Networked Personal Health Information. It is made available free of charge, but subject to the terms of a License. You may make copies of this work; however, by copying or exercising any other rights to the work, you accept and agree to be bound by the terms of the License. All copies of this work must reproduce this copyright information and notice.