Navigation
about wwb
about the debate
archive
rolling cyber debate archives
best of the best archive
featured nonprofit archive
the campaign trail archive
state directory
wwb in the news
 take our survey
Navigation
Navigation Audio Tour

WWB Evaluation (PDF)

editorial policy

privacy policy

Home

Participate in WWB Participate in WWB star take our survye Star Contact WWB star About WWB for the press Navigation

In March 2001, Web White & Blue received the SXSW Interactive Festival "Online Community" Award. We are very pleased to be recognized by this prestigious festival.

Don't forget to visit our Rolling Cyber Debate Archives


question of the day red bar
mini Today's Rolling Cyber Debate Question for John Hagelin
hagelin
candidate resources

Hagelin-Goldhaber 2000



bottom
Question: How do you feel about America's military readiness?
Submitted from Hector of Atlantic City, New Jersey through MSNBC.com (10/05/00)

 

Answer from John Hagelin:

Our Bloated Military
We spend a staggering $300 billion a year on defense--as much as the rest of the world combined...

...and 60 times more than Russia. Yet our bloated military is powerless to protect us from the most serious threats to our national security: terrorist acts by organizations and "rogue" nations armed with weapons of mass destruction. Our entire defense strategy is out of date, lacking in vision, and a costly carry-over from the Cold War era.

In this campaign, George W. Bush and Al Gore are competing to outspend each other on the military, reflecting both their parties' close financial ties to weapons manufacturers. Scarce military resources are squandered today on pork-barrel weapons like the $2 billion B2 bomber and the $60 billion flawed missile defense shield--programs that the Pentagon does not even want.

Unencumbered by special interest ties to weapons manufacturers, I would focus more of our defense resources on military personnel, training, readiness, and retention--creating a more streamlined, flexible force to effectively combat the threat of terrorism and meet our nation's security needs in the post-Cold War world.

Most important to our national defense: we must stop creating enemies. Our meddlesome foreign policy has sown the seeds of enmity throughout the world.

Most of our foreign aid is military aid. We are the world's leading arms peddler, providing weapons to both sides of most international conflicts. Our troops are often forced to confront our own weapons on the battlefield. America's foreign policy has fostered ill will throughout the world and has made us the principal target of terrorism on Earth.

I will immediately shift U.S. foreign policy away from intervention and military aid towards a more life-supporting policy, offering technical assistance in crucial areas such as business, entrepreneurism, education, sustainable agriculture, and environmentaltechnologies. This will create a more prosperous, harmonious, and secure family of nations.

Finally, recognizing our recent failures to prevent conflict and promote lasting peace through military intervention alone, I would support a "prevention wing" in the military--a true peacekeeping force trained to diffuse regional tensions among warring factions, using proven nonviolent methods of conflict resolution.

question of the day rebuttals

    No other campaigns have provided rebuttals to this yet.
blank bar


Markle Foundation logocopyright © 1998 - 2002 Markle Foundation  | Online presence by mindshare Internet Campaigns LLC.

The views expressed during the Rolling Cyber Debate are those of the participating campaigns, and not those of Web, White & Blue and the sponsorship of the Rolling Cyber Debate is not intended as an endorsement of any candidate.