Navigation
about wwb
about the debate
archive
rolling cyber debate archives
best of the best archive
featured nonprofit archive
the campaign trail archive
state directory
wwb in the news
 take our survey
Navigation
Navigation Audio Tour

WWB Evaluation (PDF)

editorial policy

privacy policy

Home

Participate in WWB Participate in WWB star take our survye Star Contact WWB star About WWB for the press Navigation

In March 2001, Web White & Blue received the SXSW Interactive Festival "Online Community" Award. We are very pleased to be recognized by this prestigious festival.

Don't forget to visit our Rolling Cyber Debate Archives


question of the day red bar
mini Today's Rolling Cyber Debate Question for Howard Phillips
phillips
candidate resources

H. Phillips answers to Bush&Gore debate questions

Contribute to help the Constitution Party

Volunteer to help the Constitution Party

Constitution Party National Website



bottom
Question: What is your position on permanent normal trade relations with China? Should trade be linked to human rights improvements in Tibet, and lessening of religious persecution by Beijing? How would your administration react if China invaded Taiwan?
Submitted from Kelly of Worcester, Massachusetts through USATODAY.com (10/18/00)

 

Answer from Howard Phillips:

U.S.-China Policy Must Be Governed By The Constitution And Sound Moral Principle
Regarding Permanent Normal Trade Relations status for Red China, constitutionally no Congress can bind future Congresses

concerning trade policy. The Constitution stipulates that Congress shall regulate commerce with foreign nations. However, the reason we have an election every two years is so that the people can review the performance of the Congress.

So, permanent Most Favored Nation status for Red China is unconstitutional, even though it is supported by both major parties.

With respect to the human rights issue, we've been down this path before. In the 1930's Franklin D. Roosevelt accorded normal diplomatic relations to Joseph Stalin and the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. The effect was to legitimate Stalin's tyranny and to deliver a message to the people of the Soviet Union that they had no hope of throwing off that tyranny because the United States of America, the symbol of freedom in the world, was in alliance with the man who was then commonly regarded as the greatest despot in the world, Joe Stalin.

When we give special treatment to Communist China we are telling the Chinese Christians who are being persecuted and we are telling the parents who want to have more than one child, that they have no hope of throwing off that tyranny because the most powerful nation in the world is in league with their oppressors. For that reason alone it is wrong for us to give Most Favored Nation status to Red China, permanently or otherwise.

Regarding the Taiwan issue, recently under pressure from Congress the Clinton Administration made a decision to sell more weapons to Taiwan. However, they put a 'trigger lock' on those weapons by saying that the weapons that Taiwan purchases will be kept in the United States. That doesn't do the people of Free China much good in a Pearl Harbor scenario.

I have been to Taiwan. I happen to have been there once in 1983, on the very day that Ronald Reagan signed the Shanghai Communique in which he asserted that thenceforward the United States would steady diminish the quality and quantity of weapons to be provide to the free Chinese on Taiwan.

I spoke on Taiwan television that day and said that the people of the United States did not support that decision. I believe that we should enhance the ability of free China to provide for its own defense. They have a strong and vibrant economy. They are capable of defending themselves if we permit them to purchase the weapons they need to counter the numerical superiority enjoyed by the mainland communist Chinese.

You need more forces to attack successfully than to defend successfully. Without direct United States involvement, Free China can defend itself if we sell them the high tech weapons which will facilitate their necessary defense.

The Constitution Party is fighting to restore constitutionally limited government in America once again and to see moral integrity prevail in our system of justice.

The Constitution Party offers America a rebirth of freedom, but we need your support. We need financial resources, we need volunteers, we need you to spread the word about our party and candidates and we need your prayers. Please consider giving what you can today to help our party succeed. The future of our country may lie in the balance.

Click here to view the Constitution Party candidate profile for Howard Phillips

Click here for a printable version of the Constitution Party platform
(Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader)

question of the day rebuttals

    No other campaigns have provided rebuttals to this yet.
blank bar


Markle Foundation logocopyright © 1998 - 2002 Markle Foundation  | Online presence by mindshare Internet Campaigns LLC.

The views expressed during the Rolling Cyber Debate are those of the participating campaigns, and not those of Web, White & Blue and the sponsorship of the Rolling Cyber Debate is not intended as an endorsement of any candidate.