Navigation
about wwb
about the debate
archive
rolling cyber debate archives
best of the best archive
featured nonprofit archive
the campaign trail archive
state directory
wwb in the news
 take our survey
Navigation
Navigation Audio Tour

WWB Evaluation (PDF)

editorial policy

privacy policy

Home

Participate in WWB Participate in WWB star take our survye Star Contact WWB star About WWB for the press Navigation

In March 2001, Web White & Blue received the SXSW Interactive Festival "Online Community" Award. We are very pleased to be recognized by this prestigious festival.

Don't forget to visit our Rolling Cyber Debate Archives


question of the day red bar
mini Today's Rolling Cyber Debate Question for Howard Phillips
phillips
candidate resources

H. Phillips answers Bush & Gore debate questions

AUDIO: Be a Real American Hero - Peg Luksik

Constitution Party National Website

Phillips 2000 Campaign Website



bottom
Question: Doesn't 'tax surplus' mean taxpayers were overcharged? If so, shouldn't we get 100% of it back? If you go shopping and get shortchanged, do you let the store keep it to spend on improvements?
Submitted from Michael of Elko, Nevada through MSNBC.com (10/23/00)

 

Answer from Howard Phillips:

Constitution Party Is Dedicated To Income Tax Elimination, Not Just Income Tax
Taxes are clearly way too high.

They should not continue to increase year after year. However, considering that we have let the federal government operate practically unchecked, this trend should not surprise us.

What ought to be done is what the Constitution Party proposes, namely to eliminate all direct federal taxation on families, individuals and businesses. Instead, we would sustain only the legitimate costs of the federal government by way of a revenue tariff on foreign imports combined on excises on nonessential goods and services, like the entertainment industry.

It would effect you the way it would effect everyone else. You would not be forced to pay any taxes to the federal government. If you prefer to buy a shoe made in Communist China to a shoe made in the United States then you would pay a twenty-five percent tariff on that shoe. But if you choose to purchase an American product you need not pay any tariff whatsoever.

If you choose to view or purchase some of the entertainment that is provided by Hollywood, you'd pay a excise tax on your movie ticket. But if you don't go to the movies and you simply stay at home and watch television you won't have to pay that entertainment tax.

We will leave to the states and local communities decisions about other taxes just like they have always been left to them. However, they won't have any tax competition from the federal government.

Although Al Gore has criticized Bush for supposedly cutting taxes to much, Bush is not really talking about cutting taxes. What he is talking about is raising more revenues for the federal government every year and sending back a portion of those additional taxes to you. In other words letting you keep some of the taxes which he raises every year. This doesn't really address the central issue of the constant increase in overall federal taxation.

In 1994 the government raised $1.3 trillion in taxes. This year it is raising $2 trillion a year in taxes. That's $700 billion a year more this year than six years ago when the Republicans gained control of Congress.

We in the Constitution Party are going to cut taxes. We are not going to raise $2 trillion in a year or $2.5 trillion a year or the $3 trillion a year which the Democrats and Republicans contemplate raising. We are going to cut tax collection by the federal government back to about $500 billion a year, because that's all the federal government needs to conduct its constitutional activities as spelled out in Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution.

The Constitution Party is offering America a rebirth of freedom.

Click here to view the Constitution Party candidate profile for Howard Phillips

question of the day rebuttals

    No other campaigns have provided rebuttals to this yet.
blank bar


Markle Foundation logocopyright © 1998 - 2002 Markle Foundation  | Online presence by mindshare Internet Campaigns LLC.

The views expressed during the Rolling Cyber Debate are those of the participating campaigns, and not those of Web, White & Blue and the sponsorship of the Rolling Cyber Debate is not intended as an endorsement of any candidate.