Navigation
about wwb
about the debate
archive
rolling cyber debate archives
best of the best archive
featured nonprofit archive
the campaign trail archive
state directory
wwb in the news
 take our survey
Navigation
Navigation Audio Tour

WWB Evaluation (PDF)

editorial policy

privacy policy

Home

Participate in WWB Participate in WWB star take our survye Star Contact WWB star About WWB for the press Navigation

In March 2001, Web White & Blue received the SXSW Interactive Festival "Online Community" Award. We are very pleased to be recognized by this prestigious festival.

Don't forget to visit our Rolling Cyber Debate Archives


question of the day red bar
mini Today's Rolling Cyber Debate Question for John Hagelin
hagelin
candidate resources

www.hagelin.org



bottom
Question: What specific standards will you use in selecting Supreme Court nominees? What are the most pressing issues the Court will deal with in the next 30 years, and how will they influence your choices? Will you put a Latino on the Supreme Court?
Submitted from Jennifer of Port Arthur, Texas through washingtonpost.com (10/29/00)

 

Answer from John Hagelin:

Supreme Court Justices Must Be Beyond Reproach
First, I will attempt to reverse a dangerous trend in our judicial system: the partisan politicization of the courts

Our Supreme Court justices must be beyond reproach -- and well beyond petty partisan politics. But these partisan political appointees have too often put party loyalty ahead of country. Our democracy is under siege. After more than 100 years of Republican and Democratic rule, we have evolved the least democratic democracy on Earth. At the expense of democracy, the two parties in power have ensured permanent victory for themselves by conspiring to keep other parties off the ballot, out of the debates, and out of the media. These discriminatory and anti-democratic practices violate the Helsinki Accords governing fair and open democracy -- the very Helsinki Accords that WE wrote and enforce throughout the world. We send Jimmy Carter and the CIA to impose these Accords on emerging democracies. Yet we flagrantly violate these Accords every day here at home. Yet the Supreme Court has upheld these illegal and anti-democratic practices time and again -- practices that undermine and threaten the very future of our democracy. For example, the courts have eviscerated the Equal Opportunity Provision of the Communications Act of Congress, which called for equal access to our publicly owned airwaves for all legally qualified candidates. The courts have also upheld absurdly discriminatory ballot access hurdles for third party and independent candidates. They have thus acted in a consistently partisan manner, and have undermined our very democracy. Second, I would attempt to reverse the dangerous trend of federal encroachment into individual rights and states' rights. Thomas Jefferson warned that the price of freedom is eternal vigilance. Our courts have been less than vigilant in preventing the federal government from reaching far beyond their Constitutional authority. I would therefore support Supreme Court justices with the highest track record of personal integrity, upholding the Constitution, and ruling in a consistently fair and non-partisan manner. Beyond these key qualifications, there would be no "litmus" tests, and no oaths of loyalty to the Natural Law Party or any other party -- only to the Constitution and to the nation. I would honor these qualifications above all considerations of race, ethnicity or gender. But the Hagelin/Goldhaber Administration will be the most diverse of any administration from the standpoints of race, religion, age and gender. The courts are the last legal resort for citizens. If the courts fail to provide justice, over time, people take to the streets. We must avoid such violent revolution by vigorously upholding justice, equity and fairness in our court system.

question of the day rebuttals

    No other campaigns have provided rebuttals to this yet.
blank bar


Markle Foundation logocopyright © 1998 - 2002 Markle Foundation  | Online presence by mindshare Internet Campaigns LLC.

The views expressed during the Rolling Cyber Debate are those of the participating campaigns, and not those of Web, White & Blue and the sponsorship of the Rolling Cyber Debate is not intended as an endorsement of any candidate.